Jurisdiction of District Courts under Insurance Act 1938

The Supreme Court of Pakistan's decision in State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan vs. Mst. Sardar Begum & Others (2017 SCMR 999) addresses the critical issue of determining the correct forum for initiating legal proceedings related to insurance claims under the repealed Insurance Act, 1938. The case provides clarity on the application of jurisdictional rules in insurance disputes, particularly concerning the distinction between Civil Courts and District Courts.

Key Issues:

Determination of the Appropriate Forum: The central issue in this case was the determination of the correct forum for suing under the provisions of the repealed Insurance Act, 1938. The respondents, who were policy holders, had filed suits in the District Courts against the State Life Insurance Corporation for claims arising out of insurance contracts executed when the Insurance Act, 1938 was still in force. The petitioners argued that under Section 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), these suits should have been filed in the Civil Courts, which are the courts of the lowest grade competent to try such suits.

Interpretation of 'Court' under Section 2(6) of the Insurance Act, 1938: The petitioners contended that the definition of 'Court' under Section 2(6) of the Insurance Act, 1938—defined as the "principal Civil Court of Original jurisdiction in a district" was relevant only for the deposit of money payable under an insurance policy, as per Section 47(1) of the Act. They argued that for determining the place of suing, the relevant provision was Section 46 of the Act, which allows the policy holder to sue in any Court of competent jurisdiction. The petitioners maintained that this phrase should be interpreted in conjunction with Section 15 of the CPC, directing the suits to be filed in Civil Courts.

Jurisdiction of District Courts vs. Civil Courts: The Lahore High Court, in its judgment, had held that suits related to insurance claims should be filed in the District Courts, as they are the principal Civil Courts of Original jurisdiction within a district. The petitioners challenged this interpretation, arguing that it would deprive them of certain appellate rights that would have been available if the suits were filed in Civil Courts.

Mst. Robina Bibi vs. State Life Insurance Corporation (2013 CLD 477): This case was referenced to support the argument that the principal Civil Court of Original jurisdiction should be the forum for insurance claims. However, the Supreme Court clarified that this interpretation was consistent with the definition provided in the Insurance Act, 1938.

Muhammad Siddiq vs. Zawar Hussain (PLJ 1976 SC 493): The Court referred to this case to underscore the principle that provisions of a special law, such as the Insurance Act, override the general provisions of the CPC when determining the forum for legal proceedings.

Court's Conclusion: The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Lahore High Court’s ruling that all suits arising from or relating to contracts of insurance under the Insurance Act, 1938, must be filed in District Courts or, depending on the pecuniary value and territorial jurisdiction, in the principal seats of the Sindh High Court or Islamabad High Court. The Court emphasized that these suits cannot be entertained in Civil Courts, as the Insurance Act, being a special law, takes precedence over the general provisions of the CPC.

The decision clarifies the jurisdictional framework for insurance disputes, ensuring that such cases are heard by courts equipped with the requisite jurisdiction to handle complex insurance matters. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the procedural requirements laid out in special legislation to avoid jurisdictional conflicts.

Contact Us:

For expert legal advice and representation in insurance matters, including navigating jurisdictional challenges and understanding the implications of special laws on insurance litigation, AUJ LAWYERS LLP offers specialized services. Contact us today for comprehensive legal support in insurance disputes.

We are here to help

Talk to our lawyers today. We tailor our services around your legal needs so that we can reach the desired outcome together.