1. Through this petition under section 497 Cr.P.C. the petitioner Mubashir Hussain has sought bail after arrest in case FIR No.185/2015 dated 27.03.2015 under sections 376, 384, 496-A PPC, Police Station Manawan, Lahore.
2. The arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties have been heard and the record of this case has also been perused with their able assistance. This is bail after arrest and deeper appreciation is not allowed at this stage. It has been noticed that although the petitioner is named in FIR, yet the fact remains that there is a delay of one month and three days in registration of FIR which has not been explained by the complainant, which prima facie reflects that the FIR has been got recorded after due deliberation and consultation. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 24.02.2015 he alongwith co-accused Muhammad Saddique enticed away the daughter of complainant for committing rape with her. It has also been noticed by this Court that the alleged abductee Mst. Mugheera Tahir has filed a private complaint against her father and brother alongwith other relatives in which she has categorically stated in her cursory statement before the learned Magistrate Okara that being sui-juris she has contracted marriage with the petitioner on 20.2.2015 with her free will and consent and in this regard copy of the Nikah Nama is attached with this petition.
Thereafter when Mst. Mugheera Tahir joined her parents she has taken somersault and has levelled allegations of rape against the present petitioner alongwith co-accused in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. It is common practice in our society that parents of the girl usually got register FIR against the boy and his family members due to the grudge that their daughter had contracted love marriage and the girl/alleged abductee also resile from her earlier statement/version. Besides Mst. Mugheera Tahir the alleged abductee has filed suit for dissolution of marriage against the petitioner Mubashir Hussain which is pending adjudication before the court of learned Judge Family Court, Wazirabad which is a proper forum to decide such matters. Reliance can easily be placed upon case titled as (Muhammad Azam vs. Muhammad Iqbal and others) PLD 1984 SC 95. Admittedly the petitioner is previous non-convict and never involved in any other case. He is behind the bars since 18.04.2015. Investigation of the case is complete and the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. His further incarceration in jail would not serve any useful purpose.
3. For what has been discussed above, the case of the petitioner becomes one of further inquiry covered by sub-section (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C. This petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioner is granted bail after arrest subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.
4. The observations made above are tentative in nature and are strictly confined to the decision of this bail petition only.
Further information regarding post arrest bail matters can be solicited from AUJ LAWYERS. Feel free to contact us in case you need any clarification and/or require legal assistance regarding similar matters.